Linux Versus Windows NT Essay -- essays research papers

analyze any network operate organisation is re totallyy like compare an apple to an orange. To judge between the underlying functionality of each operating form geared towards different networking environments is too broad of a subject to receive to a reasonable conclusion. However, one could argue about the advantages and disadvantages pertaining to the Unix based Linux operating system and the infamous Windows NT operating system. I can compare and job these two operating systems, but I can&8217t pull in a strong stand because it all depends on a rate of situations including the different networking environments, the applications that are readily forthcoming, and most important what the user wants. The design is to find out which of these two operating systems is the lesser of two evils by examining their features.I have decided not to discuss cost because it goes without axiom Linux wins the price to performance ratio. What is more important to discuss is the initial hardware and software fees, and maintenance and reliability which often go hand in hand. According to Sunworld, the estimated minimal required hardware costs that would go with a Linux machine is $200. In an NT machine, the minimal hardware cost rose up to $1300. This is because NT requires at to the lowest degree a 486 Pentium with 16MB of RAM. Linux can run fine on a 386 com prescribeer with only 8MB of RAM.What do the majority of users need a computer for? Mainly word processing and the use of a database program. An NT user doesn&8217t have to go with Microsoft portion, but a dole out of great deal do, costing a couple hundred dollars. Linux can run an Office Suite program that is very similar to Office for at least half the cost. Even a free version of WordPerfect 8 is available for Linux.A Linux system comes with a range of development tools (C/C++ Compiler, Perl, Tcl/Tk, Python, CORBA, Ada, Pascal, Lisp, REXX, Java, etc., as well as many text editors and integrated devel opment environments), all of which are free. In order to realise software under Linux, in that location is no expensive package to buy.Many NT users complain about system crashes or the dreaded &8220blue screen of death. NT systems face a lot of down times, which creates a problem for mission critical situations. It is very prevent to be working on something for a couple of hours and see it take flight or crash. Unix based systems have experie... ...n that path. NT, however, does not provide the source computer code therefore, limiting the user to only Microsoft&8217s networking and programming solutions. The creator of Linux, Linus Torvalds, veritable this operating system using past versions of Unix strengths, and avoiding the weaknesses and flaws that have been created for more than 30 years. Linus also got help from would be programmers from all over, many being hackers, to create this sophisticated operating system. Having a wide variety of help and feedback supports the integration of a system that can satisfy most users. NT, on the other hand, is developed by their own team, not taking much stipulation to what consumers really want to see.Although this report isn&8217t very cohesive to interject between each subject, I think it provides grounds to see clear how well Linux presents itself over NT. Although Linux is still in its primitive stages, the mark it has put in this world is quite remarkable. These early version of Linux provides a stepping pock for later versions to come, and possibly dominate the market when executives and upper level managers similar come to see that Linux is a great industry solution.